ISSUES
THEN AND NOW
The
initial economic boom of the 1990’s decreased the racial income
gap in both the city and suburbs. However, the gap still persists, and
the recent economic downturn (1999-2000) increased the income gap by
11%. While the poverty level fell, more Caucasians were pulled out of
poverty than any other group, increasing the racial poverty gap. The
gap is strongest in the mid to low income ranges. A detailed report can be found here
-
In 2000, for every
dollar a low-income household earned in Chicago, a high-income
household earned $3.89, compared to the national average of $1 to
$3.75.
-
The median income for
African American households is 66% of the average Caucasian household
income.
-
When the highest range is
ignored, we see that “Latino and African American men earn less
than half of their Asian American and Caucasian counterparts.”
-
More than thirty percent
of African Americans in Chicago make less than $15,000.*
-
Chicago has experienced a
net loss of jobs over the past decade. The racial gap in employment
has remained constant, with the average unemployment rate for people
of color being 11.5% compared to 3.3% for Caucasians.
-
Over this time period,
unemployment was higher in Chicago than in the suburbs, demonstrating
the movement of jobs into higher opportunity areas. Businesses,
factories, retail, and other institutions along with the jobs they
entail, have for the most part left the inner city, especially the
predominately African American neighborhoods.
-
10 of the city’s
poorest 15 neighborhoods are 94% or higher African American. ?
-
African Americans
comprise a disproportionately high amount of those who are working
but remain poor in both the city and the metropolitan area.
-
African Americans
comprise a disproportionate amount of the city’s homeless.
-
14 out of the 16 Chicago
community areas which comprise the bottom quintile of neighborhood
“economic vitality” are 94% or more African American.
-
Inhabitants of the inner
city are now faced with a harsh reality: the inner city cannot offer
the financial opportunities to generate wealth and those
neighborhoods which can do not contain attainable housing.
|