|
CLST 277: The World of Late Antiquity
Spring Semester 2011
Dr. Jacqueline Long
|
|
Study Guide for the Final Examination
Format
The exam will have three parts; you will be offered some choice
within each part:
- cut-and-dried identifications: basic factual information (small
credit per item, and a small component of the exam)
- primary-source selections: given a short passage from a late-antique
documentary or literary text we have studied, explain what knowledge and
understanding of late antique history and culture this passage helps you
to arrive at, and how - include pertinent facts about the source's
context and nature, but focus on the passage itself and how you can best
use it to pursue historical inquiry (each passage will yield a medium-sized
quantum of credit, but the passages together add up to a major component of
the exam)
- essay: explore a historical problem, setting forth relevant, specific,
concrete evidence from late antique sources, explaining how to derive knowledge
and understanding from the evidence, and showing how the knowledge and
understanding inform your answer to the problem (the largest single item of
credit; a major component of the exam)
Strategy of effective exam-taking
- Remember that the goal an exam seeks is that you should display both
KNOWLEDGE
and
UNDERSTANDING.
- Vagueness, waffling, and obfuscatory language blur knowledge. Information in an
exam-answer demonstrates that your ideas are valid because they are grounded in the
realities you have studied and are being called upon to talk about. (Of course you have
to have studied the realities and formed the ideas for the talk to have any validity,
but that's what course-work entails: the exam is an instrument for verifying your labors
in the course.) Anything that messes up the clarity of your information hurts your answer.
- Conversely, however, an undiscriminating memory-dump of information undermines your
demonstration of understanding. Information is useless until you relate it to particular
concerns. By explaining, on an exam, how the relationship between evidence, fact, and understanding
works, you demonstrate you can draw the connections that make your knowledge matter.
Information that doesn't strengthen that explanation only gets in the way.
- In the demonstration of understanding as in the demonstration of knowledge, the more
straightforwardly you present what you're saying, the more effectively you communicate.
Keep
it clear.
- Budget your time during the exam. No matter how perfectly you answer Question 1,
if you don't answer Question A you can't earn any of Question A's credit.
- The exam includes more questions than you need to answer so that you can pick the
questions you can answer best. Extra credit for extra answers, beyond the number of
questions required, is very small compared to the benefit of improving your answers to
the number of questions that are required. Only after you are sure you have answered
the required questions well will it become truly worthwhile to go back and add on bonuses.
- Technical terms are handy, but the concepts technical terms label are what's truly
important about them. Focus on the facts of the late-antique world and on understanding
(for the purposes of an exam, on explaining) how historical ideas, events, and forces
functioned.
- Strategy in studying:
when you are
considering big historical trends and developments, think of specific facts that illustrate
them, and
when you
are considering specific facts and figures and pieces of evidence, think where they fit in
to big historical developments.
Be able to explain
how the big picture and the particular item connect to one another, citing concrete evidence
and demonstrating its importance. Reflect on how you know what you know, so that you can
always explain your historical inquiry clearly.
Things to study
An effective approach to understanding what is important to focus on as
you review for an exam -in any course- is to think about how the different
elements of the course-work serve the course-design. Think about the
objectives highlighted in the syllabus and in
class discussions, and as you review the assigments
(including the Excursuses - instructor's notes-on-outcomes now posted
with the instructions)
and your notes, think about how the things you have done each help realize
some of those goals. Ask yourself, "what was that about?" Your answers will
guide you in your studying. If you want to talk about some of the connections,
please come see me - I want us to be on the same page, working toward the same
outcome -your learning- not at cross-purposes. Having thought now, in review,
about how assigments and objectives fit together, keep thinking about
their relationship.
Terms and items
you should be able to identify, to comment upon, or to refer to in a historical essay
include, for example:
- geographical locations of important events and centers of significant
communities and activities: e.g., Adrianople, Rome, Milan, Alexandria, Callinicum,
Thessalonica, Constantinople
- institutions of the Roman state and concepts and practices relating
to them: e.g., military recruitment, "federate" status, treaties, Roman state priesthoods,
the Altar of Victory, the authority of the pontifex maximus, state-supported
professorships, the consulate
- different kinds of communities within the Roman state and distinctive concepts
and practices relating to them: e.g., "federate" tribes, the Roman army, the Roman and
Constantinopolitan Senates, town councils, congregations (of various Christian sects
and of other religions), asceticism, pilgrimage
- important titles, terms, and concepts connected with Roman emperors: e.g.,
Augustus, Caesar, pontifex maximus, usurper, dynasty
- important buildings and monuments in Rome and other cities of the Empire, both specific
edifices and their types more generally: e.g., amphitheater, circus/hippodrome, palace,
forum/agora, temple, basilica, church, synagogue, triumphal arch, honorific column,
obelisk
- important religious terms: e.g., sacrifice, deacon, catechumen, priest, bishop,
anchorite, eremitic, coenobitic, monk, proselyte, Gentile, penance
- literary texts we have used as sources, their authors, and other information
that helps assess the texts: e.g., Ammianus, Symmachus's
Referral
3, Ambrose's
Letters
XVII and XVIII and
Letters XX,
XL, LI, Augustine's
Confessions,
Athanasius's Life of Antony, the Itinerary of Egeria, and Claudian's
Panegyric
for Probinus and Olybrius
- documentary and material sources we have used and information that helps
assess them: e.g., imperial laws, conciliar rulings, funerary inscriptions, the
Bordeaux Itinerary
- major historical forces and actors we have traced, including social, intellectual,
and cultural history: e.g., war, rebellion, ethnic difference, corruption, religious
controversy (between different religions and between different varieties of belief or
practice within a religious allegiance), the aspiration for holiness, Roman traditions,
law, social class, gender, visual art, individual emperors, usurpers, military and civilian
officials, Christians (ecclesiastics, monastics, and laypeople), pagans, Manichees, and Jews - as
you review your notes from the readings and from class, make a list
Moments, fields of
activity, and developments to follow - see also daily Study
Questions):
- successions of Roman emperors after Julian, including mechanisms of election,
dynasty, rebellion, and alliance
- usurpations and their consequences
- ideals and expectations relating to Roman rulers
- operations and relationships of Roman armies: specific campaigns and general tactics,
recruitment, billeting on civilian populations, involvement in enforcement of civil order
- foreign relations of the Roman state
- Rome and Constantinople as the preeminent capital cities of the Roman empire: institutions
and societies
- social interactions in other cities of the Roman empire: specific incidents, and
facilities and practices relating to more general types of experience
- social class: categories and the opportunities and expectations associated with each
- formal education in late antiquity
- Neoplatonism: fundamental concepts, intellectual background, and implications for pagans
and Christians
- developments in Christian asceticism: ideals, understandings, and varieties of practice
- developments in structures of Christian ecclesiastical authority
- families: social organization, relationships, and expectations current in late antiquity
- gender: late antique understandings, expectations, and standards of behavior for men and women
both in ordinary social contexts and in practices of religious discipline
- demands Christian and Jewish identity did or didn't put on attitudes to traditional Greek
and Roman culture
- aesthetic values in late antique literature and art
- the legacy of Roman government and culture beyond late antiquity