Notes
1. St. Gertrude of Helfta, Legatus 2.10. All references
to the Legatus are taken from the English translation by Margaret Winkworth,
The Herald of Divine Love (New York, 1993); scriptural citations
are also provided by Winkworth. Future references to the Legatus
will be cited internally.
2. Other notable early devotees of Christ's heart include William of
St. Thierry, Richard of St. Victor, and St. Francis of Assisi. For succinct
histories of the devotion up until Gertrude, see Alexandra Barratt, "Introduction"
to the Herald of God's Loving-Kindness (Kalamazoo, 1991), pp. 19-20;
Mary Jeremy Finnegan, The Women of Helfta: Scholars and Mystics (Athens,
GA, 1991), pp. 131-32; Marion Morgan, "The Sacred Heart of Jesus in Roman
Catholic Tradition," One in Christ 24 (1988), 223-36.
3. Caroline Walker Bynum, Jesus as Mother: Studies in the Spirituality
of the High Middle Ages (Berkeley, 1982), p. 193.
4. St. Gertrude of Helfta, Exercitia spiritualia, ch.
7, lines 380-84, trans. Gertrud Jaron Lewis and Jack Lewis (Kalamazoo,
1989), p. 135.
5. For Pseudo-Dionysius, of course, all language about God necessarily
takes on the status of metaphor; he goes so far as to say "we must not
then dare to speak, or indeed to form any conception, of the hidden super-essential
Godhead, except those things that are revealed to us from the Holy Scriptures."
See Dionysius the Areopagite, On the Divine Names and the Mystical Theology,
trans. C. E. Rolt (London, 1920). A helpful study of medieval negative
theology and apophatic language is Michael Sells, Mystical Languages
of Unsaying (Chicago, 1994). Jacques Derrida's "How to Avoid
Speaking"(1989) is also rather spectacular if by definition not entirely
enlightening. A succinct discussion of the problem in relation to
medieval women's mysticism can be found in the introductory chapter of
Elizabeth Petroff's Body and Soul: Essays on Medieval Women and Mysticism
(New York, 1994), esp. p. 4. For a variety of approaches, see
also the essays in Mysticism and Language, ed. Steven T. Katz (New
York, 1992).
6. Cited by Ulrike Wiethaus, Ecstatic Transformation: Transpersonal
Psychology in the Work of Mechthild of Magdeburg (Syracuse, 1996),
p. 127.
7. Cited in the introduction to Hildegard's works in Emilie Zum Brunn
and Georgette Epiney-Burgard, Women Mystics in Medieval Europe,
trans. Sheila Hughes (New York, 1989), p. 7.
8. The reasons for this must also be conjectural. I might put
forth the suggestion that Gertrude's unusual degree of learnedness in Latin
may have afforded her a surer foothold and authority in a male-dominated
intellectual discourse; but that is only part of an explanation.
9. Zum Brunn and Epiney-Burgard, Women Mystics, pp. xxxi-xxxii.
10. Marguerite Porete, The Mirror of Simple Souls, trans. Ellen
L. Babinsky (New York, 1993), pp. 194-95.
11. Hadewijch of Brabant, Vision 7, trans. Mother Columba Hart
in Hadewijch: The Complete Works (New York, 1980), p. 280.
12. This idea is fascinatingly and complexly laid out in fuller detail
by Karma Lochrie in Margery Kempe and Translations of the Flesh (Philadelphia,
1991), esp. ch. 1, "The Body as Text and the Semiotics of Suffering."
13. Editor Margaret Winkworth suggests that the words translated here
as "repeated inspiration"—alternatis vicibus, "by alternating times"—refer
to Christ's heartbeats.
14. Elizabeth Petroff ascribes "the idea that the visionary is not
a vessel but a text, a body in whom or on whom a text is inscribed" to
Marguerite d'Oingt (d. 1310), calling this idea a "new perspective" which
she in fact specifically contrasts with Gertrude's. See Petroff,
Medieval Women's Visionary Literature (New York, 1986), p. 278.
However, the heart-to-heart mode of transmission in Marguerite d'Oingt's
writings appears to me more similar to Gertrude's than contrasting.
Further comparison between the two mystics seems called for.
15. For a parallel to this idea, see Karma Lochrie's discussion of
the Monk of Farne (Margery Kempe, pp. 56-57, 69). One should
note, however, that the Monk eventually confesses imprinting on the reader's
heart to be an impossibility, whereas Gertrude seems more optimistic about
this point.